## Summary Submitting **N** Tier 5.5 queries for BrainBench. - Author handle: `@your-handle` - File location: `eval/external-authors/your-handle/queries.json` - Queries authored fresh (not copy-pasted from a model output) - Slugs verified against `eval/data/world-v1/` (via `bun run eval:world:view`) ## Checklist - [ ] `bun run eval:query:validate eval/external-authors/your-handle/queries.json` passes - [ ] At least 20 queries - [ ] Each query has either `gold.relevant` (with real slugs) or `gold.expected_abstention: true` - [ ] Temporal queries have `as_of_date` set (`corpus-end` | `per-source` | ISO-8601) - [ ] Phrasing is varied (not all the same template) - [ ] `author` field matches my handle ## Phrasing variety (optional self-audit) Tick the styles represented in your batch: - [ ] Full sentence questions - [ ] Fragment-style ("crypto founder Goldman Sachs background") - [ ] Comparison ("X vs Y") - [ ] Follow-up ("And who else...") - [ ] Imperative ("Pull up Alice Davis") - [ ] Trait-based ("the demanding engineering leader") - [ ] Abstention bait (answer is "not in corpus") ## Notes to reviewer Anything worth flagging — ambiguous cases, corpus gaps you found, specific phrasings you were uncertain about.